Making our voices heard

Bangladeshi scientists continue to be missing in leading publications on climate change

Image Source:BIGSTOCK

On February 28, the sixth Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment Report (AR6) for Working Group II (WGII) was released, serving as the new basis for global policy-making on how to adapt to climate change.

As one of the most vulnerable countries to climate change and a global leader in adaptation, Bangladeshi scientists should be at the forefront of work on adaptation in Bangladesh. However, in past IPCC reports, foreign scientists have dominated the lead authorship in this area. Is there something different in this report?

The WGII report focuses on “impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability.” It follows a new report from IPCC Working Group I on the physical science of climate change, released in August 2021, and precedes the Working Group III report on mitigation that will come out in April 2022.

The IPCC reports summarize all scientific publications on the most pressing issues related to climate change. As adaptation to the impacts of climate change has become an increasingly urgent issue, especially in places like Bangladesh, the IPCC’s attention to adaptation and vulnerability has grown. This new WGII report informs how Bangladesh will address its vulnerabilities and set adaptation priorities.

Global inequality in climate science

The research that is cited in the IPCC reports must be peer-reviewed and published in reputable academic outlets. This is a high standard, especially for scientists in the Global South. Producing such work requires substantial effort and resources, including access to expensive academic journals, resource-intensive research, and writing up the results in English. Successfully publishing IPCC-eligible work means scientists contribute to the global knowledge basis about climate change and the policies that are made based on it.

This has led to inequality in IPCC reports, both in the authors of the cited publications and the IPCC authors themselves. We already know that only two of the 163 authors of the WGII report are from Bangladesh. In contrast, 31 authors come from the United States. Across all three working group reports for AR6, only 44% of authors were from “developing countries and countries with “economies in transition.”

This is a slight improvement from the fifth assessment report in which these countries represented 37% of authorship. The majority of authors are still men who come from the Global North.

What about the scientists producing research on climate change? Studies have found that the majority of top-cited climate articles come from only three countries: the US, the UK, and Australia.

When Reuters published a “Hot List” ranking the world’s top climate scientists in 2021, more than 75% were from Europe and North America. In a study of the first authors of publications on Bangladesh cited in the last WGII report, it was found that only 26% came from Bangladeshi institutions, while 74% were from international institutions.

Do Bangladeshi scientists lead Bangladesh adaptation citations?

We investigated whether Bangladeshi scientists are being cited for work on Bangladesh and adaptation. To do this, we reviewed the first five WGII reports and searched for mentions of “Bangladesh.” We collected the relevant citations, along with all additional publications cited in the report with “Bangladesh” in their titles.

In academic work, the first author of research publications is typically the person who contributed the most work, or the leader of the research team. We made a list of the first authors of the articles we collected and researched their backgrounds. We tabulated the number of articles authored by Bangladeshis and by non-Bangladeshis in each report. Paralleling the growth in the number of articles on climate change over time, the number of articles in the WGII report on Bangladesh has also risen significantly.


The accompanying graph displays our results. The IPCC reports included were the 1990 First Assessment Report (FAR), the 1995 Second Assessment Report (SAR), the 2001 Third Assessment Report (TAR), the 2007 Fourth Assessment Report (AR4), and the 2014 Fifth Assessment Report (AR5).

As is visible in the graph, non-Bangladeshi authors have led authorship on adaptation and Bangladesh in four out of the five reports. Bangladeshis only comprised a majority of the lead authors in the third report (19 Bangladeshis versus 16 non-Bangladeshis). In the most recent report (AR5) there were 41 Bangladeshi lead authors compared to 59 non-Bangladeshi authors.

Though it is difficult to determine the location of individual authors at the time they published their research, we also worked to identify whether Bangladeshi authors cited in the reports were primarily located in Bangladesh or abroad. In each of the five reports, about one-third of the Bangladeshi authors were located outside of Bangladesh, typically at research institutes and universities in the Global North. This shows the continued importance of connections to foreign institutions for producing IPCC-eligible publications.

The authorship of publications cited in the new WGII report the continued barriers Bangladeshi authors face in publishing. There are numerous Bangladeshi researchers producing insightful and innovative work that should be foregrounded in the global knowledge base on adaptation. With their added benefit of close knowledge of the local context, they should be the primary references for determining the impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability of Bangladesh. Their work deserves proper recognition and consideration in policy-making.

It is critically important that scientists from the Global South have a powerful voice in shaping global conversations on climate change. Their countries have contributed the least to climate change but will experience the worst impacts. These are also the countries where substantive work is being done to adapt. Investment in researchers from countries like Bangladesh, support for their publishing, and attention to their work from the IPCC can only benefit global efforts to combat climate change.

We hope that forthcoming reports will reflect a shift toward greater recognition of Global South contributions to climate knowledge.

Dr Saleemul Huq is the Director of the International Centre for Climate Change and Development at the Independent University, Bangladesh. Danielle Falzon is a PhD Candidate in Sociology at Brown University and a Visiting Researcher at the International Centre for Climate Change and Development. Janaki Kapadia is a research assistant and student at the University of Illinois Laboratory High School.


Originally this article was published on March 2, 2022 at Dhaka Tribune.

About The Authors

Prof. Saleemul Huq is Director of the International Centre for Climate Change & Development (ICCCAD)

Sirazoom Munira is working as Program Officer to support Climate Vulnerable Forum Presidency of GoB based at the Global Centre on Adaptation.